THE SECOND MOVEMENT OF LAW AND ECONOMICS, EFFICIENCY AND CONSENSUS OF THE ORIENTING NEOCLASSICAL SUBJECTIVE MODEL OF RICHARD POSNER

RUPTURE OR (RE)APPROXIMATION TO CONTEMPORARY RULE OF LAW SATE

Authors

  • Alfredo Copetti Neto Unijuí
  • José Luis Bolzan de Morais UNISINOS

Keywords:

Second movement Law and Economics, Economic efficiency, Contemporary Rule of Law

Abstract

It addresses, in this essay, the theoretical foundations of the second movement Law and Economics, especially if considered from the works of Richard Posner. Commends itself therefore the ideological and political model assumed and observed critically the development of the efficientist theoretical aspect applied to the right. Finally, we emphasize the mismatch of the second movement Law and Economics in relation to the contemporary model of rule of law.

Author Biographies

Alfredo Copetti Neto, Unijuí

 

Doutor em Teoria do Direito e da Democracia pela Università degli Studi di Roma Tre (título revalidado PPG-D/UFPR). Mestre em Direito Público pela Unisinos. Cumpre estágio Pós-Doutoral com bolsa PDJ/CNPQ no PPG-D Unisinos. Docente permanente do Programa de Pós-Graduação em Direitos Humanos da Unijuí. Advogado OAB-RS.

José Luis Bolzan de Morais, UNISINOS

Mestre em Ciências Jurídicas pela PUC-RJ. Doutor em Direito do Estado (UFSC/Université de Montpellier I). Professor do PPGD/Unisinos (Mestrado e Doutorado). Consultor da Capes, CNPQ, Fapergs, Fapesq e UFRN. Pesquisador CNPQ. Coordenador do Grupo de Pesquisa Estado e Constituição (CNPq). Procurador do Estado do Rio Grande do Sul.

References

ANDERSON, Elizabeth. Value in Ethics and Economics. USA: Harvard University Press, 1993.

BECKER, Gary S. The Economic Approach to Human Behavior. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press, 1976.

BOBBIO, Norberto. Liberalismo e Democrazia. Milano: Simonelli Editore, 2006.

BOLZAN de MORAIS, José Luis. As Crises do Estado e da Constituição e a Transformação

Espacial dos Direitos Humanos. Porto Alegre: Livraria do Advogado, 2002.

CALABRESI, Guido. Some Thoughts on Risk Distribution and the Law of Torts. In: The Yale Law

Journal. Vol. 70. N° 4, 1961.

CALABRESI, Guido; BOBBITT, Philip. Scelte tragiche. Giufrè Editore: Milano, 2006.

CALABRESI, Guido. About Law and Economics: A Letter to Ronald Dworkin. In: Hofstra Law Review. N° 8, 1980.

CALSAMIGLIA, Albert. Eficiencia y Derecho. In: Doxa, N°4, 1987.

CHIASSONI, Pierluigi. Law and Economics: l’analisi economica del diritto negli Stati Uniti. Torino:

Giappichelli Editore, 1992.

COASE, Ronald. The Problem of Social Costs. In: Journal of Law and Economics, October, 1960.

COASE, Ronald. The Nature of the Firm. Economica,(n.s.) , N°. 4., 1937.

COLE, David. The Poverty of Posner’s Pragmatism: Balancing Away Liberty After 9/11. In: Stanford Law Review. N° 59. 2007.

COLEMAN, Jules. Markets, Morals, and the Law. 2. ed. New York: Oxford University Press, 2005. COOTER, Robert; RAPPOPORT, Peter. Were the Ordinalists Wrong About Welfare Economics? In:

Journal Economics Literature. N° 22, 1984.

DWORKIN, Ronald. Why Efficiency? In: Hofstra Law Review. N° 8, 1980.

DUXBURY, Neil. Patterns of Amercian Jurisprudence. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1997.

FERRAJOLI, Luigi, Principia Iuris. Teoria del diritto e della democrazia. 2. Teoria dela democrazia. Roma-Bari: Laterza, 2007.

FRIEDMAN, Milton. The methodology of Positive Economics. In: Essays in Positive Economics. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1970.

HICKS, John. The Foundations of welfare Economics. In: The Economic Journal, December, 1939.

HOVENKAMP, Herbert. The First Great Law & Economics Movement. In: Stanford Law R HICKS, John. The Foundations of welfare Economics. In: The Economic Journal, December, 1939. Review. Vol. 42, 2009.

HUERTA DE SOTO, Jesús. Escola Austríaca. Mercado e criatividade empresarial. Lisboa: O Espírito das Leis Editora, (n.d).

KALDOR, Nicholas. Welfare Propositions in Economics and Interpersonal Comparison of Utility, In: The Economic Journal, September, 1939.

KORNHAUSER, Lewis. The Economic Analysis of Law, 2006. Disponível em: http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/legal-econanalysis/index.html#return-20.

MACKAAY, Ejan. History of Law and Economics. In: BOUCKAERT, Boudewijn and DE GEEST, Gerrit. Encyclopedia of Law and Economics, Volume I. The History and Methodology of Law and Economics, Cheltenham, Edward Elgar, 2000.

MINDA, Gary. Teorie posmoderne Del diritto. Bologna: Mulino, 2001.

MINDA, Gary. The lawyer–Economist at Chicago: Richard A. Posner and the Economic Analysis of

Law. In: Ohio State Law Journal. N° 39, 1978.

PARISI, Francesco. Scuole e metodologie nell’analisi economica del diritto. Disponível em:

http://www.jus.unitn.it/cardozo/review/Authors.html. Acesso em julho de 2009. PARETO, Wilfredo. Manuale di economia política. Milano: EGEA, 2006.

POLINSKY, Mitchell A. An Introduction to Law and Economics. 3. ed. New York: Aspen Publishers, 2003.

POSNER, Richard. A. Utilitarianism, Economics, and Legal Theory. In: The Journal of Legal Studies. N° 8, 1979

POSNER, Richard A. Gary Becker’s Contributions to Law and Economics. In: Journal of Legal Studies. N° 22, 1979.

POSNER, Richard. El análisis económico del derecho. 2. ed. México: Fondo de cultura econômica, 2007.

POSNER, Richard. The Economic of Justices. Topeka: Topeka Bindery, 1981.

POSNER, Richard. The Problems of Jurisprudence. USA: Harvard University Press, 1990. POSNER, Richard. Frontiers of legal theory. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 2004.

REYERSON, James. The Outrageous Pragmatism of Judge Richard Posner. Disponível em: http://linguafranca.mirror.theinfo.org/0005/posner.html#1. Acesso em outubro de 2012.

ROBBINS, Lionel C. An Essay on the Nature and Significance of Economic Science. London: Macmillan, 1932.

ROSA, Alexandre Morais da; LINHARES, José Manuel Aroso. Diálogos com a Law and Economics. Rio de Janeiro: Lumen Iuris, 2009.

ROTHBARD, Murray N. Man. Economiy and State. A Treatise on Economic Principles with Power and Market Government and the Economy. 2. ed. Auburn. Alabama. Ludwig Von Mises Institute, 2001.

SAMUELSON, Paul A. Consumption Theory in Terms of Revealed Preference. In: Econômica. N° 15, 1948.

SCAFF, Fernando Facury. Responsabilidade Civil do Estado Intervencionista. 2. ed. Rio de Janeiro, 2001.

SCITOVSKY, Tibor. A Note on Welfare Propositions in Economics. In: Review of Economics Studies. N° 9. 1941.

SCHUMPETER, Joseph. On the Concept of the Social Value. In: Quarterly Journal of Economics. Volume 23, 1908-9.

WATSON, John B. Behaviorism. New York: People's Institute Publishing Company, 1925.

Published

2020-11-03

How to Cite

Copetti Neto, A., & Bolzan de Morais, J. L. (2020). THE SECOND MOVEMENT OF LAW AND ECONOMICS, EFFICIENCY AND CONSENSUS OF THE ORIENTING NEOCLASSICAL SUBJECTIVE MODEL OF RICHARD POSNER: RUPTURE OR (RE)APPROXIMATION TO CONTEMPORARY RULE OF LAW SATE. Constituição, Economia E Desenvolvimento: Revista Eletrônica Da Academia Brasileira De Direito Constitucional , 3(4), 56–76. Retrieved from https://abdconstojs.com.br/index.php/revista/article/view/28

Similar Articles

<< < 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.