LIBERDADE DE EXPRESSÃO COMO INSTRUMENTO DE CONSTRUÇÃO DA PAZ
Palavras-chave:
Liberdade de expressão, Livre expressão política, Construção da paz, Tolerância; diversidadeResumo
Nesse estudo será conceituado como a liberdade de expressão serve a análise das tragédias e conflitos históricos e quais são os limites aceitáveis da livre discussão sobre os eventos histórica ou politicamente sensíveis. Meu principal objetivo é demonstrar a função de construção da paz na liberdade de expressão: dentro de quais circunstâncias pode a discussão política ilimitada suportar a compreensão de pós-conflitos, e quando a liberdade de expressão somente causa grave dano moral e até dano físico a determinadas pessoas. Meu estudo será baseado em duas principais correntes de fontes: a jurisprudência nacional e internacional de órgãos judiciais; as contribuições acadêmicas fundamentais no campo da liberdade de expressão durante os períodos de conflito e pós-conflito. Como conclusão da minha pesquisa, um padrão global mínimo deve ser proposto para resolver os conflitos da livre expressão política e o interesse de se proteger a ordem e coesão social, o que pode ser um relevante ponto de referência para órgãos legislativos nacionais e internacionais. Essa pesquisa irá abrir novas perspectivas no campo da liberdade de expressão, que pode esperançosamente contribuir para a devida interpretação da livre discussão sobre matérias historicamente sensíveis de interesse público. De outro lado, a principal conclusão é que maiores e mais profundas discussões profissionais são necessárias para reconsiderar a importância da liberdade de expressão como um instrumento fundamental de construção da paz.
Referências
ALEXANDER, Larry. Is There a Right of Freedom of Expression? Law and Philosophy.
Vol. 27, no 1. p. 97-104, 2008.
ARCHARD, David. Insults, Free Speech and Offensiveness. Journal of Applied Philosophy.
Vol 31, no 2. p. 127-141, 2014.
BARENDT, Eric. Freedom of Speech. 2. ed. Oxford: OxfordUniversity Press, 2005.
BERGER, Fred R. The Right of Free Expression. International Journal of AppliedPhilosophy. Vol. 3, no 2. p. 1-10, 1986.
BODNEY, David J. ExtremeSpeech and American Press Freedoms. In: HARE, Ivan; WEINSTEIN, James Weinstein (eds). Extreme Speech and Democracy. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2009, p. 598-607
BULL, Anna Cento; HANSEN, Hans Lauge. On Agonistic Memory. MemoryStudies. Vol. 9, no 4, 2016, p. 390–404.
CONNERTON, Paul. How Societies Remember. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1989.
COOK, Philip; HEILMANN, Conrad Heilmann. Two Types of Self-Censorship: Public and Private. Political Studies. Vol. 61, no1. p. 178-196, 2013.
DELGADO, Richard; STEFANCIC, Jean. Four Observations about Hate Speech. 44 Wake Forest Law Review. p. 353-370, 2009.
GIDDENS, Anthony. Central Problems in Social Theory: Action, Structure, and Contradiction in Social Analysis. Berkeley: University of California Press, 1979, p. 53.
DIJK, Pieter van; HOOF, Fried van; RIJN, Arjen van; ZWAAK, Leo Zwaak (ed.). Theory and practice of the European Conventionon Human Rights. 4. Ed. Antwerpen:Oxford, 2009.
EUROPEAN COURT OF HUMAN RIGHTS. Lingens v. Austria. 1986, application no. 9815/82, § 42-47.
EUROPEAN COURT OF HUMAN RIGHTS. Baka v. Hungary. 2016, application no. 20261/12.
EUROPEAN COURT OF HUMAN RIGHTS. Delfi AS v.Estonia, 2015, application no. 64569/09.
EUROPEAN COURT OF HUMAN RIGHTS. Flux v. Moldova, 2009, application no. 25367/05
EUROPEAN COURT OF HUMAN RIGHTS. Fratanolo v. Hungary. 2011, application no. 29459/10.
EUROPEAN COURT OF HUMAN RIGHTS. Garaudy v. France. 2003, application no. 65831/01
EUROPEAN COURT OF HUMAN RIGHTS. Handyside v. UK. 1976, application no. 5493/72, § 49.
EUROPEAN COURT OF HUMAN RIGHTS. Jersild v.Denmark. 1994, application no. 15890/89.
EUROPEAN COURT OF HUMAN RIGHTS. Leroy v France. 2008, application no. 36109/03.
EUROPEAN COURT OF HUMAN RIGHTS. Lindon and others v. France. 2007, application no. 21279/02 and 36448/02.
EUROPEAN COURT OF HUMAN RIGHTS. Oberschlick v. Austria. 1991, application no. 11662/85.
EUROPEAN COURT OF HUMAN RIGHTS. Perinçek v. Switzerland. 2015, Application no. 27510/08.
EUROPEAN COURT OF HUMAN RIGHTS. Sunday Times v. UK. 1979, application no. 6538/74, § 65.
EUROPEAN COURT OF HUMAN RIGHTS. Vajnai v. Hungary. 2007, application no. 33629/06.
EUROPEAN COURT OF HUMAN RIGHTS. Vejdeland and Others v. Sweden. 2012, application no. 1813/07.
EUROPEAN COURT OF HUMAN RIGHTS. Von Hannover kontra Németország. 2004, application no. 40660/08 and 60641/08.
FEINDTETAL, Gregor. EntangledMemory: Toward a Third Wave in Memory Studies. History and Theory, 2014. Vol. 53, no1.
FEUCHTWANG, Stephan. Memorials to Injustice. In: BELL, Duncan. Memory, Trauma and World Politics. Reflections on the Relation ship Between Past and Present. Basingstoke: PalgraveMacmillan, 2007.
FINLAYSON, Alan. Rhetoric and Radical Democratic Political Theory. In: LITTLE, Adrian; LLOYD, Moya. The Politics of Radical Democracy. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press,2008, p. 13–32.
FREDERICK, Danny. Freedom: Positive, Negative, Expressive. Reason Papers. vol. 38, no 2, 2016, p. 39-63.
GELBER, Katharine. Freedom of Political Speech, Hate Speech and the Argument From Democracy: The Transformative Contribution of Capabilities Theory. Contemporary Political Theory. Vol. 9, no 3. p. 304-324, 2010.
GIDDENS, Anthony. Central Problems in Social Theory: Action, Structure, and Contradiction in Social Analysis. Berkeley: University of California Press, 1979.
GREENE, Amanda Greene; SIMPSON, Robert Mark. Tolerating Hate in the Name of Democracy. Modern Law Review. Vol. 80, no 4. p. 746-765, 2017.
HALBWACHS, Maurice. On Collective Memory. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1992.
HERZ, Michael; MOLNAREDS, Peter. The Content and Context of Hate Speech: Rethinking Regulation and Responses. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2012.
JACOBY, Tami Amanda. A Theory of Victimhood: Politics, Conflict and theConstruction of Victim-BasedIdentity. Millennium – Journal of International Studies. Vol. 43, no 2, 2015.
JANIS, Mark W.; KAY, Richard S.; BRADLEY, Anthony W.; European Human Rights Law. 3. ed., Oxford, Oxford University Press. p. 206-209, 2008.
JUDT, Tony; SNYDER, Timothy.Thinking the Twentieth Century. New York: William Heinemann, 2012.
KLEIN, E. R. WhitherAcademicFreedom? International Journal of Applied Philosophy. Vol 16, no 1. p. 41-53, 2002.
LENGBEYER, Lawrence. Rhetoric and Anti-Semitism. Academic Questions. Vol. 17, no 2. p. 22-32, 2004.
LEWIS, Anthony. Defining Freedom(chapter 4) In: LEWIS, Anthony. Freedom for the Thought That We Hate: A Biography of theFirst Amendment. New York: Basic Books, 2008, p. 39-58.
LOVELAND, Ian. Sullivan v. The New York Times. (chapter 5). In: Loveland, Political Libels: A Comparative Study. Oxford: Hart, 2000, p. 65-85.
MÄLKSOO, Maria. The MemoryPolitics of Becoming European: The East European Subalterns and the Collective Memory of Europe. European Journal of International Relations. Vol. 15, no 4, 2009.
MARGALIT, Avishai. The Ethics of Memory. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2002.
MCDONAGH, Maeve. The Right to Information in International Human Rights Law. Human Rights Law Review. p. 1-31, 2013.
MILLAR, Gavin. Whitherthespirit of Lingens. European Human Rights Law Review. p.277-288, 2009.
NICOL, Andrew; MILLAR, Gavin; SHARLAND, Andrew. Media Law and Human Rights. 2. Ed. Oxford: OUP. p. 13-34, 2009.
OLICK, Jeffrey K. The Politics of Regret: On Collective Memory and Historical Responsibility. New York: Routledge, 2007.
PASSERINI, Louisa. Memories of Resistance, Resistances of Memory. In: BURDETT, Charles; GORRARA, Claire. (ed.) European Memories of theSecond World War: New Perspectives on Postwar Literature. New York: BerghahnBooks, 1999.
RANDAL, Marlin. Propaganda and the Ethics of Persuasion. Broadview Press. p. 226-229, 2002.
RICHARDS, David. Free Speech and Obscenity Law: Toward a Moral Theory of the First Amendment. University of Philadelphia Law Review. p. 70-91, 1974.
ROSTBØLL, Christian F. Freedom of Expression, Deliberation, Autonomy and Respect. European Journal of Political Theory. Vol. 10, no 1. p. 5-21, 2011.
ROUSSO, Henry. The History of Memory: Brief Reflections on an Overload ed Field. In: BLAIVE, Muriel; GERBEL, Christian; LINDENBERGER, Thomas. Clashes in European Memory: The Case of Communist Repression and the Holocaust. Innsbruck: Studienverlag, 2011.
SEWELL, William H. Logics of History: Social Theory and Social Transformation. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2005.
SIMPSON, Robert Mark. Defining ‚Speech’: Subtraction, Addition, and Division”. Canadian Journal of Law and Jurisprudence. Vol. 29, no 2. p. 457-494, 2016.
SOFFIAUX, Stefan. Leroy v France: apology of terrorism and the malaise of the European Court of Human Rights free speech jurisprudence. European Human Rights Law Review. p. 415-427, 2009.
STANLEY, Jason. How Propaganda Works. Princeton. NJ: Princeton University Press, 2015.
STONE, Dan. Good bye to All That ? The Story of Europe Since 1945. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2014.
STONE, Geoffrey. Free Speech in the Twenty-First Century: Ten Lessons from the Twentieth Century. Pepperdine Law Review. p. 273-299, 2009.
STRAUSS, David A. Persuasion, Autonomy, and Freedom of Expression. Columbia Law Review. vol. 91, no 2, 1991.
SULLIVAN, Kathleen M. TwoConcepts of Freedom of Speech. 124 Harvard Law Review. p. 143-177, 2010.
SULLIVAN, Kathleen M.. Political Money and Freedom of Speech. 30 UC Davis Law Review. p. 667-673, 1997.
TOTH, Mano Gabor. The Myth of thePolitics of Regret. Millennium – Journal of International Studies. Vol. 43, no 2. p. 551–566, 2015.
UNITED STATES. Supreme Court. Beauharnais v. Illinois.1952, 343 U.S. 250
UNITED STATES. Supreme Court. Brandenburg v.Ohio.1969, 395 U.S. 444
UNITED STATES. Supreme Court. Gertz v. Robert Welch. 1974, 418 U.S. 323
UNITED STATES. Supreme Court. R.A.V. v. City of St. Paul. 1992, 505 U.S. 377
UNITED STATES. Supreme Court. Virginia v. Black. 2003, 538 U.S. 343
WEINSTEIN, Allen; RUBEL, David. The Story of America: Freedom and Crisis from Settlement to Superpower. DK Publishing, Inc.: New York, N.Y., 2002, p. 58-63.
WEINSTEIN, James. An Overview of American Free Speech Doctrine and its Application to Extreme Speech. In: HARE, Ivan; WEINSTEIN, James. (eds.): Extreme Speech and Democracy. Oxford: OxfordUniversity Press, 2009, p. 81-91.
WHITE, Hayden. The Content of the Form: Narrative Discourse and Historical Representation. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, 1990.
WILDHABER, Luzius. The European Court of Human Rights in Action’ 21. Ritsumeikan Law Review. p. 83-84, 2004.
WINTER, Jay. Remembering War: The Great War Between Memory and History in the Twentieth Century. New Haven: Yale University Press, 2006.
WINTER, Jay; SIVAN, Emmanuel. (eds.) War and Remembrance in the Twentieth Century. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1999.
WYDRA, Harald. The Power of Symbols: Communism and Beyond. International Journal of Politics, Culture, and Society. Vol. 25, no1–3, 2011.
ZERUBAVEL, Eviatar. SocialMemories: Stepsto a Sociology of thePast. Qualitative Sociology. vol. 19, no 3, 1996.
