THE CONSTITUTIONAL STATE AND THE SOCIAL PARADIGM OF RISK
Keywords:
Sociology of Risk, Culture, Globalization, Politics, Rule of LawAbstract
The purpose of this article is to identify what we call the social paradigm of risk: a sociological basis for understanding the contemporary risks and build a bridge to their theoretical assimilation within the theory of state and constitutional law. Risk has become a key element for the understanding of Constitutional Law, but Law itself does not provide a meaning for risk in contemporary society. Social sciences, on the other hand, have developed various possible frameworks dealing with risk, which, nonetheless, may conflict with each other. Rather than focusing on the differences that create points of conflict between the various theoretical frameworks of risk, this work focus on mapping the consensus points of the approaches developed in the social sciences. In this light, the absence of a homogeneous approach can be seen as an advantage, living up to the multidimensional nature of risk in modern society.
References
BECK, Ulrich. De la fe en el mercado a la fe en el Estado. El Pais, 15 Abr 2008. Disponível em: <http://elpais.com/diario/2008/04/15/opinion/1208210411_850215. html>. Acesso em: 16 mar. 2016.
BECK, Ulrich. Risk society: towards a new modernity. London: Sage, 1992. BECK, Ulrich. What is globalization? Cambridge: Polity, 2000.
BECK, Ulrich. World at risk. Cambridge: Polity, 2009.
BECK, Ulrich. World risk society. Cambridge: Polity, 1999.
BERNSTEIN, Peter L. Against the gods: the remarkable story of risk. New York: Wiley, 1996.
BRADBURY, Judith. Thepolicyimplicationsof differingconceptsofrisk. Science Technology & Human Values, v. 14, n. 4, p. 380-399, 1989.
CAMPBELL, Scott e CURRIE, Greg. Against Beck: in defence of risk analysis. Philosophy of Social Sciences, v. 6, n. 2, p. 149-172, 2006.
CASTEL, Robert. From dangerousness to risk. BURCHELL, G.; GORDON, C.; MILLER, P. (Org.). The Foucault effect: studies in governmentality. Chicago: Univerisity of Chicago Press, 1991. p. 281-298.
CUCHE, Dennys. A noção de cultura nas ciências sociais. Tradução V. Ribeiro. 2. ed. Bauru: EDUSC, 2002.
DE GIORGI, Raffaele. Direito, democracia e risco: vínculos com o futuro. Tradução Juliana N. Magalhães; Menelick De Carvalho Netto. Porto Alegre: Fabris, 1998.
DOUGLAS, Mary. Risk and blame: essays in cultural theory. London: Routledge, 1994.
EWALD, François. Insurance and risk. BURCHELL, G.; GORDON, C.; MILLER, P. (Org.). The Foucault effect: studies in governmentality. Chicago: Univerisity of Chicago Press, 1991. p. 197-210.
EWALD, François. L’Etat providence. Paris: Grasset, 1986.
EWALD, François. Risk in contemporary society. Connecticut Insurance Law
Journal, v. 6, n. 2, p. 365-379, 2000.
EWALD, François. The return of the crafty genius: an outline of a philosophy of
precaution. Connecticut Insurance Law Journal, v. 6, n. 1, p. 47-79, 1999.
FOUCAULT, Michel. Governmentality. BURCHELL, G.; GORDON, C.; MILLER, P. (Org.). The Foucault effect: studies in governmentality : with two lectures by and an interview with Michel Foucault. Chicago: Univerisity of Chicago Press, 1991. p. 87-104.
FOUCAULT, Michel. Segurança, território, população: curso dado no Collège de France (1977-1978). Tradução E. Brandão. São Paulo: Martins Fontes, 2008.
GALLIE, Walter Bryce. Essentially contested concepts. Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society: New series, v. 56, p. 167-198, 1956.
GIDDENS, Anthony. Risk and responsibility. The Modern Law Review, v. 62, n. 1, p. 1-10, 1999.
GIDDENS, Anthony. Runaway world: how globalization is reshaping our lives. New York: Routledge, 2002.
HISKES, Richard P. Democracy, risk, and community: technological hazards and the evolution of liberalism. New York: Oxford University Press US, 1998.
JASANOFF, Sheila. The fifth branch: science advisers as policymakers. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1994.
KUHN, Thomas. The structure of scientific revolutions. 3. ed. Chicago: Univerisity of Chicago Press, 1996.
LUHMANN, Niklas. Observations on modernity. Tradução William Whobrey. Stanford: Stanford University Press, 1998.
LUHMANN, Niklas. Risk: a sociological theory. New Brunswick: Aldine Transaction, 2006.
LUPTON, Deborah. Risk. New York: Routledge, 1999.
MOSS, David. A. When all else fails: government as the ultimate risk manager.
Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 2002.
PASCUAL, Gabriel Doménech. Derechos fundamentales y riesgos tecnológicos: el derecho del ciudadano a ser protegido por los poderes públicos. Madrid: Centro de Estudios Políticos y Constitucionales, 2006.
PERETTI-WATEL, Patrick. La société du risque. Paris: La Découverte, 2001. PIDGEON, Nick e KASPERON, Roger e SLOVIC, Paul. The social amplification of
risk. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2003. RENN, Ortwin. Risk governance. London: Earthsan, 2008.
SLOVIC, Paul. Perceived risk, trust and democracy. SLOVIC, P. (Org.). The perception of risk. London: Earthscan Publications, 2000a. p. 316-326.
SLOVIC, Paul. Perception of risk. SLOVIC, P. (Org.). The perception of risk. London: Earthscan Publications, 2000b. p. 220-231.
SLOVIC, Paul. Rational actors and rational fools: the influence of affect on judgment and decision-making. Roger Williams University Law Review, n. 6, p. 163-212, 2000c.
STARR, Chauncey e WHIPPLE, Chris. Risks of risks decisions. Science, v. 208, n. 6, p. 1114-1119, 1980.
TORRES, Ricardo Lobo. Legalidade tributária e os riscos sociais. Revista Dialética de Direito Tributário, n. 59, p. 95-112, 2000.
WEBER, Max. Economy and society: an outline of interpretive sociology. Berkeley: University of California Press, 1978.
ZINN, Jens e TAYLOR-GOOBY, Peter. Risk as an interdisciplinary research area. TAYLOR-GOOBY, P.; ZINN, J. (Org.). Risk in social science. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2006. p. 20-53.
